I used to think you could skip the full pressure test on a small patch job
An old guy I worked with on a job in Cleveland, Frank, told me once that if you're just doing a small patch on a low-pressure system, you can just do a soap test and call it good. He said the full hydrostatic test was overkill and a waste of a half day. I followed that for a while, until about six months ago. We patched a feedwater line on a small hotel boiler, just a 6-inch section. Did the soap test, no bubbles, looked perfect. Two days later, the plant manager called me back because the area was damp. A tiny pinhole had opened up under real operating pressure and temperature, something the soap test at room temp didn't catch. We had to shut the whole system down again. Frank's advice was wrong, and it cost us way more time and a hit to our reputation. Now I test every single weld, no matter how small. Has anyone else had a simple test fail them like that?