Posts
Recent Comments
2d ago
inSerious question, why do we keep treating this 6,000 year old Peruvian site like the excavation methods from the 1970s still apply?
The real issue is nobody talks about how even high tech scanners can mess up if the ground has any moisture left in it we had a team in Nazca who fried a sensor because the layer looked dry but had trapped humidity. That older gear might be rough but at least it didn't short out and brick the whole season's data. Sometimes the old guys are stubborn for a reason you dont learn testing your toys on the clock.
3d ago
inPicked up an old Rolleiflex at a flea market in Austin and noticed something odd inside
tbh that's a solid point about not scratching the film but those old leather strips also tended to dry out and crack over time, especially in dry climates. i've seen a couple vintage cameras where the leather repair basically turned into dust after a few years.
3d ago
inWhen does a failed loaf become a win? I hit a weird milestone this weekend
Read something similar in a baking mag, failure teaches better than success. @ray_webb6 nailed it.
5d ago
inAI saved my old photo scanning project after 3 failed attempts
Bought a $30 scanner and called it a day.
8d ago
inRan G-Code without checking the tool offset and paid for it
Iris, you're right that three hours isn't the worst, but it's the kind of thing that makes you wonder why we don't double check the simple stuff first. It reminds me of how people will spend all day trying to fix a computer problem, only to find out the power cord came loose. We all tend to look for the hard answers when the easy ones are right in front of us. I've done the same thing with a stuck tailstock on a lathe - spent an hour adjusting the gibs before noticing the lock pin was fully engaged. It's like our brains skip over the obvious just to make us work for it.