Wasted 2 years chasing a moon landing hoax rabbit hole before one simple fact snapped me out of it

I spent 2 years deep in forums and YouTube videos about the moon landing being faked, convinced the shadows were wrong and the flag was waving. Then I watched a NASA engineer break down the actual lighting angles using a 3D model of the Apollo 11 site. It showed the shadows were totally consistent with the sun at 10 degrees above the horizon, not some studio setup. Has anyone else had one detail that completely unraveled a conspiracy theory they bought into?

2 comments

2 Comments

elliotc1012d ago

The 3D model thing is what got me too. I was deep into the 9/11 truther stuff for a while, thinking the towers came down too perfectly. Then I saw a simulation that showed the actual column temperatures from the jet fuel fires and how they weakened the steel over time. It was nowhere near as dramatic as the conspiracy videos made it look, just a slow, horrible collapse that made total sense once you saw the math. What really sealed it was footage of a controlled demolition next to that simulation side by side. The controlled demo was way faster and more symmetrical, not like the messy, uneven fall of the towers at all. That one comparison just flattened my whole belief system in a minute.

tylerw9212d ago

Honestly, "flattened my whole belief system in a minute" hits hard because that's exactly how it felt for me too. Once you see that side-by-side comparison of the real collapse versus a controlled demo, there's just no way to unsee how different the physics actually are. It's wild how one simple piece of evidence can undo months of digging into theories that felt so convincing at the time.