A comment on my post about the moon landing made me rethink my whole approach

I used to argue that the shadows in the photos were definitive proof of a studio set, but a user linked a clear physics diagram from a university website showing how parallel sunlight works on uneven ground. I changed my mind because the evidence was solid and explained simply. Has anyone else had a 'smoking gun' piece of evidence turn out to be totally wrong?

3 comments

3 Comments

felixlewis28d ago

That university diagram could easily be faked too. You should check the actual light angles in Apollo 12 photos, they still don't line up.

parker_bell28d ago

Those physics diagrams always assume a single light source, but studio sets use multiple lights.

mason.paige20d ago

Ugh, my old "proof" was just bad math. @felixlewis, you're probably next.