Loading…
0
Can we talk about how fake moon landing 'evidence' gets recycled every election cycle?
Honestly, I noticed this week that the same 1978 interview clip with a NASA tech pops up again on my feed, edited with new subtitles. I actually went back and found the original transcript in a library archive, took me about 4 hours. The clip cuts out the part where he says 'in the studio model' referring to a lighting test, not the actual landing. Tbh, my uncle sends me these same links every year, and I finally showed him the timestamp mismatch. Has anyone else tracked down the source footage and seen how the edits change the meaning?
1 comments
Log in to join the discussion
Log In1 Comment
noahs821mo ago
The 1978 clip actually shows a lighting test, not the landing.
-1